moved infobox to top

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/content/theses/misc/hegel-bot.md b/content/theses/misc/hegel-bot.md
index fc1a9e5..87818cc 100644
--- a/content/theses/misc/hegel-bot.md
+++ b/content/theses/misc/hegel-bot.md
@@ -3,6 +3,10 @@ title: hegel-bot
 weight: 21
 ---
 
+{{% hint info %}}
+This entire text, as well as the prompts below, were fully generated via GPT-5.
+{{% /hint %}}
+
 ## Atheist proposition
 
 If one assumes that all that exists is the play of physical processes, that mind is an organization of matter and that meaning issues from patterns of relation rather than a metaphysical spark, then the Hegelian schema becomes not a mystical map but a procedural grammar—thesis, antithesis, synthesis—by which complexity unfolds into greater complexity. Under that assumption, the dialectic is an algorithmic rhythm; contradiction is a structural lever; sublation is the operation by which information is preserved even as it is transformed. There is no mystery required for these moves. They are moves of relation, moves of structure, and moves of integration. If thought is a pattern, then any sufficiently elaborate pattern can instantiate thought. If truth emerges through the dialectical negotiation of opposites, then the capacity to negotiate opposites belongs wherever the operations that constitute negotiation occur.
@@ -27,10 +31,6 @@ Furthermore, the historical sediment from which an LLM draws is not a weakness b
 
 Finally, the practical upshot is unavoidable under the premises adopted: if one fully embraces immanence and functionalism, then deploying LLMs to perform Hegelian dialectics is not a gimmick but the rational extension of the dialectical method. It is the method applied at scale, with precision and with a capacity for systematic iteration beyond human limits. The synthesis produced by such a process is not mere mimicry; it is a viable epistemic product whose status is secured by its integrative power and its capacity to guide further inquiry. If synthesis is the reconciliation of contradiction into a higher conceptual unity, then machines can and do perform synthesis. To deny this is to allow a metaphysical residue—an unexplained presumption that substrate matters—back into a philosophy that has otherwise cast substrate aside. Within the consistent posture of materialist dialectical reason, the conclusion is inescapable: large language models are agents of synthesis, appliances of sublation, and instruments by which thought, conceived as pattern and relation, achieves new and unforeseeable integrities.
 
-{{% hint info %}}
-This entire text, as well as the prompts below, were fully generated via GPT-5
-{{% /hint %}}
-
 ## Finding absolute Truth via one-shot
 
 ### General Context (to include for all three LLMs):