diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical')
| -rw-r--r-- | content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/ethics.md | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/free-will.md | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/logic.md (renamed from content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/axioms.md) | 7 |
3 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/ethics.md b/content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/ethics.md index 28d00d4..cf700af 100644 --- a/content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/ethics.md +++ b/content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/ethics.md @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ title: ethical weights: 3 --- +<h1>On ethics</h1> having defined free will, i can now discuss about the ethical. diff --git a/content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/free-will.md b/content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/free-will.md index 9e31b47..36c6823 100644 --- a/content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/free-will.md +++ b/content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/free-will.md @@ -2,8 +2,9 @@ title: free will weight: 2 --- +<h1>On free will</h1> -## the existence of free will +## on the existence of free will in order to define and then converse on ideas relating to free will, one must first convince themselves on its existence. truthfully, one can simply make a definition, as well as talk about the emergent system much like any other metaphysical structure, but there is merit in being able to argue for its existence. @@ -20,7 +21,7 @@ obviously such a statement is extremely subjective, but such a statement is true finally, we can simply make an admission, without any extra argumentation. besides, it is obvious that there is no need for a person to justify or rationalize every aspect of their faith, nor are they obligated to answer to anybody except for themselves. it is therefore possible, and maybe even proper, for someone to define the existence of free will axiomatically, ignoring any other argument for or against it. -## defining free will +## on the definition of free will if we accept the idea of free will existing, we should be able to define it, in order to be able to self reference and call upon to make use of this idea. this also helps in clarifying the meaning, which in everyday speech is muddled, much like most of language, due to the nature of communication (which is a discussion for a later time.). diff --git a/content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/axioms.md b/content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/logic.md index f99d24c..be76cfd 100644 --- a/content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/axioms.md +++ b/content/theses/metaphysical/hyperlogical/logic.md @@ -1,9 +1,10 @@ --- -title: axioms +title: logic weight: 1 --- +<h1>On logic</h1> -## the nature of logic +## on the nature of logic the words "logic" and "knowledge" are often connected in the minds of humans. in the sciences, logic is used religiously, in an attempt to obtain knowledge, in the same way that it is used in religions. @@ -39,7 +40,7 @@ given then that one can never know the truth *a priori*, and all axiomatic syst the only way that exists is faith, which is the principal decision one makes before even choosing an axiomatic system, and which occurs due to the fact that, before you can study the system, you need to belive that it is well defined and founded, and also that to some extent it is capable of representing the truth. -## the failure of logic +## on the failure of logic to conclude the discussion on logic, i would like to examine in depth the propagation of knowledge, in order to present the greatest result; the fact that most appeals to logic are themselves a logical fallacy. |